← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mazda 2 1.3 75 vs Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.40 s at 84.6 mph against the Mazda 2 1.3 75’s 19.32 s — a margin of 2.92 s. To 60 mph the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 takes 8.22 s and the Mazda 2 1.3 75 12.75 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda 2 1.3 75 Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMazda 2 1.3 75Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129
0–60 mph12.75 s8.22 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.30 s2.50 s
1/8 mile12.58 s10.57 s
1/4 mile19.32 s16.40 s
Trap speed73.1 mph84.6 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75, 2/2 for the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMazda 2 1.3 75Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129
Year20072017
Power74 bhp127 bhp
Kerb mass930 kg1,025 kg
Power to weight79 bhp/t124 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelSuzuki 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,686 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mazda 2 1.3 75 or the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 faster?
The Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.40 s to the Mazda 2 1.3 75's 19.32 s, a margin of 2.92 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.22 s against 12.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mazda 2 1.3 75 0-60 time?
The Mazda 2 1.3 75 reaches 60 mph in 12.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.32 s at 73.1 mph.
What is the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 reaches 60 mph in 8.22 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.40 s at 84.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mazda 2 1.3 75 trips the lights at 73.1 mph and the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129 at 84.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75 and 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift Sport 1.4 Boosterjet 129. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.