Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) vs Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003)
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) is the quicker car,
covering it in 14.49 s at
95.1 mph against the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003)’s
16.18 s — a margin of
1.69 s. To 60 mph the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) takes
6.00 s and the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003)
8.10 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2)
Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003)
0–60 mph
6.00 s
8.10 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.22 s
2.72 s
1/8 mile
9.34 s
10.54 s
1/4 mile
14.49 s
16.18 s
Trap speed
95.1 mph
87.4 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
9/10 for the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2),
2/2 for the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003) —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) or the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003) faster?
The Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.49 s to the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003)'s 16.18 s, a margin of 1.69 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.00 s against 8.10 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) 0-60 time?
The Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) reaches 60 mph in 6.00 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.49 s at 95.1 mph.
What is the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003) 0-60 time?
The Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003) reaches 60 mph in 8.10 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.18 s at 87.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) trips the lights at 95.1 mph and the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003) at 87.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) and 2 of 2 for the Fiat Barchetta 1.8 16V 130 (2003). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.