Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 vs Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2)
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) is the quicker car,
covering it in 14.49 s at
95.1 mph against the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95’s
17.45 s — a margin of
2.96 s. To 60 mph the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) takes
6.00 s and the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
9.92 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2)
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2)
0–60 mph
9.92 s
6.00 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.77 s
2.22 s
1/8 mile
11.21 s
9.34 s
1/4 mile
17.45 s
14.49 s
Trap speed
78.8 mph
95.1 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95,
9/10 for the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 or the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) faster?
The Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.49 s to the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95's 17.45 s, a margin of 2.96 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.00 s against 9.92 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What is the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) 0-60 time?
The Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) reaches 60 mph in 6.00 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.49 s at 95.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 trips the lights at 78.8 mph and the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2) at 95.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 and 9 of 10 for the Mazda MX-5 2.0 (ND2). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.