← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 vs BMW M2 (G87)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the BMW M2 (G87) is the quicker car, covering it in 11.89 s at 118.3 mph against the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381’s 12.24 s — a margin of 0.35 s. To 60 mph the BMW M2 (G87) takes 3.63 s and the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 3.73 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 BMW M2 (G87)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381BMW M2 (G87)
0–60 mph3.73 s3.63 s
0–100 mph9.55 s8.42 s
60 ft1.83 s1.89 s
1/8 mile7.81 s7.73 s
1/4 mile12.24 s11.89 s
Trap speed111.2 mph118.3 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381, 9/10 for the BMW M2 (G87) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381BMW M2 (G87)
Year20152023
Power375 bhp453 bhp
Kerb mass1,555 kg1,725 kg
Power to weight241 bhp/t263 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveRear drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 4 seconds881 carsQuarter mile under 12 seconds780 cars0-100 under 9 seconds871 carsTraps over 110 mph1,380 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mercedes-AMG 0-60 timesevery modelBMW 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 or the BMW M2 (G87) faster?
The BMW M2 (G87). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 11.89 s to the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381's 12.24 s, a margin of 0.35 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.63 s against 3.73 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 0-60 time?
The Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 reaches 60 mph in 3.73 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.24 s at 111.2 mph.
What is the BMW M2 (G87) 0-60 time?
The BMW M2 (G87) reaches 60 mph in 3.63 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 11.89 s at 118.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 trips the lights at 111.2 mph and the BMW M2 (G87) at 118.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mercedes-AMG A45 (W176) 2.0 4MATIC 381 and 9 of 10 for the BMW M2 (G87). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.