Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 vs Renault Koleos 2.5 170
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 is the quicker car,
covering it in 17.06 s at
80.3 mph against the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150’s
18.35 s — a margin of
1.29 s. To 60 mph the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 takes
9.44 s and the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150
11.39 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150
Renault Koleos 2.5 170
0–60 mph
11.39 s
9.44 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.01 s
2.57 s
1/8 mile
11.87 s
10.94 s
1/4 mile
18.35 s
17.06 s
Trap speed
75.9 mph
80.3 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150,
2/2 for the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 or the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 faster?
The Renault Koleos 2.5 170. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.06 s to the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150's 18.35 s, a margin of 1.29 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.44 s against 11.39 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 reaches 60 mph in 11.39 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.35 s at 75.9 mph.
What is the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 0-60 time?
The Renault Koleos 2.5 170 reaches 60 mph in 9.44 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.06 s at 80.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 trips the lights at 75.9 mph and the Renault Koleos 2.5 170 at 80.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC 150 and 2 of 2 for the Renault Koleos 2.5 170. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.