Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) vs BMW X1 xDrive23d 211
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 is the quicker car,
covering it in 15.09 s at
89.4 mph against the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16)’s
17.13 s — a margin of
2.04 s. To 60 mph the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 takes
6.59 s and the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16)
9.47 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16)
BMW X1 xDrive23d 211
0–60 mph
9.47 s
6.59 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.58 s
2.13 s
1/8 mile
11.01 s
9.56 s
1/4 mile
17.13 s
15.09 s
Trap speed
80.8 mph
89.4 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16),
2/2 for the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) or the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 faster?
The BMW X1 xDrive23d 211. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.09 s to the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16)'s 17.13 s, a margin of 2.04 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.59 s against 9.47 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) 0-60 time?
The Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) reaches 60 mph in 9.47 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.13 s at 80.8 mph.
What is the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 0-60 time?
The BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 reaches 60 mph in 6.59 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.09 s at 89.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) trips the lights at 80.8 mph and the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211 at 89.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) and 2 of 2 for the BMW X1 xDrive23d 211. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.