Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) vs Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) is the quicker car,
covering it in 17.13 s at
80.8 mph against the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104’s
17.79 s — a margin of
0.66 s. To 60 mph the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) takes
9.47 s and the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104
10.33 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16)
Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104
0–60 mph
9.47 s
10.33 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.58 s
2.80 s
1/8 mile
11.01 s
11.37 s
1/4 mile
17.13 s
17.79 s
Trap speed
80.8 mph
76.4 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16),
2/2 for the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) or the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104 faster?
The Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.13 s to the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104's 17.79 s, a margin of 0.66 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.47 s against 10.33 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) 0-60 time?
The Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) reaches 60 mph in 9.47 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.13 s at 80.8 mph.
What is the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104 0-60 time?
The Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104 reaches 60 mph in 10.33 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.79 s at 76.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) trips the lights at 80.8 mph and the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104 at 76.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Nissan Juke 1.0 DiG-T 117 (F16) and 2 of 2 for the Kia Niro 1.6 GDI 104. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.