← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.59 s at 78.8 mph against the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115’s 18.10 s — a margin of 0.51 s. To 60 mph the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 takes 10.11 s and the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 10.75 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startNissan Qashqai 1.6 115Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122
0–60 mph10.75 s10.11 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.07 s2.83 s
1/8 mile11.77 s11.34 s
1/4 mile18.10 s17.59 s
Trap speed77.9 mph78.8 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115, 2/2 for the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationNissan Qashqai 1.6 115Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122
Year20102019
Power113 bhp121 bhp
Kerb mass1,297 kg1,436 kg
Power to weight87 bhp/t84 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Nissan 0-60 timesevery modelMazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 or the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 faster?
The Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.59 s to the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115's 18.10 s, a margin of 0.51 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.11 s against 10.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 0-60 time?
The Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 reaches 60 mph in 10.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.10 s at 77.9 mph.
What is the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 0-60 time?
The Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 reaches 60 mph in 10.11 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.59 s at 78.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 trips the lights at 77.9 mph and the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122 at 78.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 and 2 of 2 for the Mazda CX-30 2.0 SKYACTIVE 122. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.