Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 is the quicker car,
covering it in 16.93 s at
83.8 mph against the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115’s
18.10 s — a margin of
1.18 s. To 60 mph the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 takes
9.12 s and the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115
10.75 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115
Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165
0–60 mph
10.75 s
9.12 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.07 s
2.89 s
1/8 mile
11.77 s
11.05 s
1/4 mile
18.10 s
16.93 s
Trap speed
77.9 mph
83.8 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115,
2/2 for the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 or the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 faster?
The Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.93 s to the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115's 18.10 s, a margin of 1.18 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.12 s against 10.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 0-60 time?
The Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 reaches 60 mph in 10.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.10 s at 77.9 mph.
What is the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 reaches 60 mph in 9.12 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.93 s at 83.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 trips the lights at 77.9 mph and the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165 at 83.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Nissan Qashqai 1.6 115 and 2 of 2 for the Mitsubishi Grandis 2.4 165. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.