Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 vs MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 is the quicker car,
covering it in 16.11 s at
85.8 mph against the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH’s
17.29 s — a margin of
1.18 s. To 60 mph the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 takes
7.84 s and the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH
9.46 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130
MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH
0–60 mph
7.84 s
9.46 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.50 s
2.83 s
1/8 mile
10.39 s
11.16 s
1/4 mile
16.11 s
17.29 s
Trap speed
85.8 mph
80.6 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130,
2/2 for the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 or the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH faster?
The Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.11 s to the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH's 17.29 s, a margin of 1.18 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.84 s against 9.46 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 0-60 time?
The Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 reaches 60 mph in 7.84 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.11 s at 85.8 mph.
What is the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH 0-60 time?
The MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH reaches 60 mph in 9.46 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.29 s at 80.6 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 trips the lights at 85.8 mph and the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH at 80.6 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 130 and 2 of 2 for the MG MG3 1.5 VTi-TECH. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.