← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 vs Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.56 s at 81.5 mph against the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)’s 18.24 s — a margin of 1.69 s. To 60 mph the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 takes 8.72 s and the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) 11.37 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startSkoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)
0–60 mph8.72 s11.37 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.42 s2.90 s
1/8 mile10.53 s11.79 s
1/4 mile16.56 s18.24 s
Trap speed81.5 mph76.1 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150, 2/2 for the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)
Year20162006
Power148 bhp134 bhp
Kerb mass1,625 kg1,640 kg
Power to weight91 bhp/t82 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Skoda 0-60 timesevery modelRenault 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 or the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) faster?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.56 s to the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006)'s 18.24 s, a margin of 1.69 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.72 s against 11.37 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 0-60 time?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 reaches 60 mph in 8.72 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.56 s at 81.5 mph.
What is the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) 0-60 time?
The Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) reaches 60 mph in 11.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.24 s at 76.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 trips the lights at 81.5 mph and the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006) at 76.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 150 and 2 of 2 for the Renault Espace 2.0 16V 140 (2006). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.