← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 vs Kia Cerato Koup 2.0

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.98 s at 87.8 mph against the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92’s 17.65 s — a margin of 1.66 s. To 60 mph the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 takes 7.54 s and the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 10.01 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 Kia Cerato Koup 2.0

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startSuzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92Kia Cerato Koup 2.0
0–60 mph10.01 s7.54 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.92 s2.59 s
1/8 mile11.42 s10.37 s
1/4 mile17.65 s15.98 s
Trap speed79.2 mph87.8 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92, 9/9 for the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationSuzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92Kia Cerato Koup 2.0
Year20052009
Power91 bhp154 bhp
Kerb mass945 kg1,330 kg
Power to weight96 bhp/t116 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Suzuki 0-60 timesevery modelKia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 or the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 faster?
The Kia Cerato Koup 2.0. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.98 s to the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92's 17.65 s, a margin of 1.66 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.54 s against 10.01 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 reaches 60 mph in 10.01 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.65 s at 79.2 mph.
What is the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 0-60 time?
The Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 reaches 60 mph in 7.54 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.98 s at 87.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 trips the lights at 79.2 mph and the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0 at 87.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Swift 3dr 1.3 92 and 9 of 9 for the Kia Cerato Koup 2.0. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.