Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 vs Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 is the quicker car,
covering it in 17.19 s at
80.0 mph against the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112’s
17.77 s — a margin of
0.58 s. To 60 mph the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 takes
9.74 s and the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112
10.41 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112
Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116
0–60 mph
10.41 s
9.74 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
2.79 s
2.59 s
1/8 mile
11.39 s
11.05 s
1/4 mile
17.77 s
17.19 s
Trap speed
77.3 mph
80.0 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112,
2/2 for the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 or the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 faster?
The Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.19 s to the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112's 17.77 s, a margin of 0.58 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.74 s against 10.41 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 reaches 60 mph in 10.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.77 s at 77.3 mph.
What is the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 0-60 time?
The Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 reaches 60 mph in 9.74 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.19 s at 80.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 trips the lights at 77.3 mph and the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116 at 80.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 and 2 of 2 for the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI 116. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.