← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 vs BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.86 s at 81.3 mph against the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95’s 17.45 s — a margin of 0.59 s. To 60 mph the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 takes 8.86 s and the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 9.92 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116
0–60 mph9.92 s8.86 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.77 s2.54 s
1/8 mile11.21 s10.84 s
1/4 mile17.45 s16.86 s
Trap speed78.8 mph81.3 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95, 2/2 for the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116
Year20222020
Power94 bhp114 bhp
Kerb mass1,165 kg1,385 kg
Power to weight81 bhp/t82 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volkswagen 0-60 timesevery modelBMW 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2020s868 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 or the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 faster?
The BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.86 s to the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95's 17.45 s, a margin of 0.59 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.86 s against 9.92 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What is the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 0-60 time?
The BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 reaches 60 mph in 8.86 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.86 s at 81.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 trips the lights at 78.8 mph and the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116 at 81.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 and 2 of 2 for the BMW 1 Series (F20) 116d 116. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.