← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) vs Mazda 2 1.3 75

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) is the quicker car, covering it in 18.19 s at 78.4 mph against the Mazda 2 1.3 75’s 19.32 s — a margin of 1.13 s. To 60 mph the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) takes 10.95 s and the Mazda 2 1.3 75 12.75 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) Mazda 2 1.3 75

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo V40 1.6 109 (2000)Mazda 2 1.3 75
0–60 mph10.95 s12.75 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.15 s3.30 s
1/8 mile11.91 s12.58 s
1/4 mile18.19 s19.32 s
Trap speed78.4 mph73.1 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000), 2/2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo V40 1.6 109 (2000)Mazda 2 1.3 75
Year20002007
Power107 bhp74 bhp
Kerb mass1,230 kg930 kg
Power to weight87 bhp/t79 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelMazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) or the Mazda 2 1.3 75 faster?
The Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 18.19 s to the Mazda 2 1.3 75's 19.32 s, a margin of 1.13 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.95 s against 12.75 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) 0-60 time?
The Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) reaches 60 mph in 10.95 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.19 s at 78.4 mph.
What is the Mazda 2 1.3 75 0-60 time?
The Mazda 2 1.3 75 reaches 60 mph in 12.75 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.32 s at 73.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) trips the lights at 78.4 mph and the Mazda 2 1.3 75 at 73.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) and 2 of 2 for the Mazda 2 1.3 75. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.