← My Auto Racer All cars Alfa Romeo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Alfa Romeo 4C

The Alfa Romeo 4C reaches 60 mph in 4.41 s (100 km/h in 4.61 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 12.77 s, tripping the lights at 106.7 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 1.86 s and the eighth mile in 8.19 s, reaching 100 mph in 10.62 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Alfa Romeo 4C TVR Griffith 500

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Alfa Romeo 4C
0–60 mph4.41 s
0–100 km/h4.61 s
0–100 mph10.62 s
60 ft1.86 s
1/8 mile8.19 s
1/4 mile12.77 s
Trap speed106.7 mph

About the 4C

The 2013 Alfa Romeo 4C is a rear-drive turbocharged supercar of 895 kg with 237 bhp, which works out at 265 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 265 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 1.86 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 1,564th quickest to 60 mph, inside the fastest quarter, and the 6th quickest of the 268 Alfa Romeos here. Its 106.7 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 9 of 10 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Alfa Romeo 4C
Year2013
Power237 hp (177 kW)
Kerb mass895 kg
Power to weight265 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed160 mph (258 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
TVR Griffith 50020004.46 s12.76 s109.9 mph321 bhp
Aston Martin DB7 GT20034.37 s12.89 s111.6 mph429 bhp
Brabus E V12 W21019964.44 s12.74 s113.7 mph574 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Lotus Elise 1.6 vs Alfa Romeo 4CFull comparisonAlpine A110 Mk II vs Alfa Romeo 4CFull comparisonLotus Emira 2.0 365 vs Alfa Romeo 4CFull comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman vs Alfa Romeo 4CFull comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 5 seconds2,158 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,845 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,638 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,963 carsTraps over 100 mph2,737 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Alfa Romeo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest supercars629 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Alfa Romeo 4C 0-60 time?
The Alfa Romeo 4C reaches 60 mph in 4.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 1,564th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Alfa Romeo 4C quarter mile time?
12.77 s at 106.7 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 8.19 s and clears the first 60 ft in 1.86 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Alfa Romeo 4C have?
237 bhp and 895 kg, which is 265 bhp per tonne. It is rear-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 258 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Alfa Romeo 4C?
Closest here on pace: TVR Griffith 500 (4.46 s), Aston Martin DB7 GT (4.37 s), Brabus E V12 W210 (4.44 s). Each one can be raced against the Alfa Romeo 4C in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Alfa Romeo 4C is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 9 of its 10 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.