← My Auto Racer All cars BMW 0-60 Comparisons Answers

BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981)

The BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) reaches 60 mph in 12.23 s (100 km/h in 13.57 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 19.36 s, tripping the lights at 75.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.42 s and the eighth mile in 12.74 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) Chevrolet Aveo Sedan 1.2 86

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981)
0–60 mph12.23 s
0–100 km/h13.57 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.42 s
1/8 mile12.74 s
1/4 mile19.36 s
Trap speed75.0 mph

About the 5 Series 518 90

The 1981 BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) is a rear-drive naturally aspirated saloon of 1,160 kg with 89 bhp, which works out at 76 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 76 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 3.42 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 13,037th quickest to 60 mph, and the 1,292nd quickest of the 1324 BMWs here. Its 75.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981)
Year1981
Power89 hp (66 kW)
Kerb mass1,160 kg
Power to weight76 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear drive
Gears4
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed102 mph (164 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Chevrolet Aveo Sedan 1.2 86201112.21 s19.00 s74.3 mph84 bhp
Lincoln Continental four-door 7.5 V8 206197012.28 s19.60 s80.1 mph207 bhp
Subaru Impreza 1.5 105200512.22 s19.00 s74.5 mph103 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Honda Accord 1.8 100 vs BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981)Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
BMW 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 1980s1,057 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) 0-60 time?
The BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) reaches 60 mph in 12.23 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 13,037th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) quarter mile time?
19.36 s at 75.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 12.74 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.42 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) have?
89 bhp and 1,160 kg, which is 76 bhp per tonne. It is rear-drive, naturally aspirated, with 4 gears and a quoted top speed of 164 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981)?
Closest here on pace: Chevrolet Aveo Sedan 1.2 86 (12.21 s), Lincoln Continental four-door 7.5 V8 206 (12.28 s), Subaru Impreza 1.5 105 (12.22 s). Each one can be raced against the BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The BMW 5 Series 518 90 (1981) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.