← My Auto Racer All cars Fiat 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150

The Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 reaches 60 mph in 9.06 s (100 km/h in 9.69 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.94 s, tripping the lights at 80.9 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.57 s and the eighth mile in 10.86 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 Citroen Saxo 3dr VTS 1.6i 90

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150
0–60 mph9.06 s
0–100 km/h9.69 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.57 s
1/8 mile10.86 s
1/4 mile16.94 s
Trap speed80.9 mph

About the 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150

The 2018 Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 is a front-drive turbodiesel car of 1,495 kg with 148 bhp, which works out at 99 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.57 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,531st quickest to 60 mph, and the 85th quickest of the 455 Fiats here. It leaves better than it pulls: 80.9 mph at the lights is only the 9,545th highest here, so its 0-60 flatters what it does further out. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150
Year2018
Power148 hp (110 kW)
Kerb mass1,495 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears9
EngineTurbodiesel
Top speed122 mph (196 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Citroen Saxo 3dr VTS 1.6i 9019989.11 s16.98 s82.7 mph89 bhp
MG Montego EFi19849.09 s16.96 s84.8 mph117 bhp
Citroen C4 Hatchback 1.6 VTi 12020089.11 s16.94 s83.3 mph118 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Fiat 500 1.2 69 vs Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150Full comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Fiat 0-60 timesevery modelFastest diesel cars4,019 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 0-60 time?
The Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 reaches 60 mph in 9.06 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,531st quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 quarter mile time?
16.94 s at 80.9 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.86 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.57 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 have?
148 bhp and 1,495 kg, which is 99 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbodiesel, with 9 gears and a quoted top speed of 196 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150?
Closest here on pace: Citroen Saxo 3dr VTS 1.6i 90 (9.11 s), MG Montego EFi (9.09 s), Citroen C4 Hatchback 1.6 VTi 120 (9.11 s). Each one can be raced against the Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Fiat 500 X 2.0 MultiJet 150 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.