← My Auto Racer All cars Fiat 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95

The Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 reaches 60 mph in 10.61 s (100 km/h in 11.27 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.76 s, tripping the lights at 76.8 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.61 s and the eighth mile in 11.36 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 MG ZT 2.0d 116

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95
0–60 mph10.61 s
0–100 km/h11.27 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.61 s
1/8 mile11.36 s
1/4 mile17.76 s
Trap speed76.8 mph

About the Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95

The 2015 Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 is a front-drive turbodiesel saloon of 1,205 kg with 94 bhp, which works out at 78 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.61 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 11,144th quickest to 60 mph, and the 203rd quickest of the 455 Fiats here. Its 76.8 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95
Year2015
Power94 hp (70 kW)
Kerb mass1,205 kg
Power to weight78 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbodiesel
Top speed112 mph (180 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
MG ZT 2.0d 116200110.63 s17.82 s77.4 mph114 bhp
Chevrolet Aveo Sedan 1.3 ECO 95201110.57 s17.88 s76.6 mph94 bhp
SEAT Altea XL 1.2 TSI 105200910.53 s17.69 s77.1 mph103 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 vs Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Fiat 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 0-60 time?
The Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 reaches 60 mph in 10.61 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 11,144th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 quarter mile time?
17.76 s at 76.8 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.36 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.61 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 have?
94 bhp and 1,205 kg, which is 78 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbodiesel, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 180 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95?
Closest here on pace: MG ZT 2.0d 116 (10.63 s), Chevrolet Aveo Sedan 1.3 ECO 95 (10.57 s), SEAT Altea XL 1.2 TSI 105 (10.53 s). Each one can be raced against the Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Fiat Tipo / Egea 1.3 Multijet 95 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.