← My Auto Racer All cars Honda 0-60 Comparisons
The Honda Fit Sport reaches 60 mph in 9.63 s and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.35 s, tripping the lights at 80.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.80 s and the eighth mile in 11.23 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Honda Fit Sport |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 9.63 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 2.80 s |
| 1/8 mile | 11.23 s |
| 1/4 mile | 17.35 s |
| Trap speed | 80.3 mph |
The 2009 Honda Fit Sport is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,182 kg with 117 bhp, which works out at 99 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.80 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 2,929 cars in the set it is the 2,844th quickest to 60 mph, and the 36th quickest of the 41 Hondas here. Its 80.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 9 of 9 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Honda Fit Sport |
|---|---|
| Year | 2009 |
| Power | 117 bhp |
| Kerb mass | 1,182 kg |
| Power to weight | 99 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Front drive |
| Gears | 6 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 183 km/h |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Ibiza 1.0 TSI 95 (Mk5) | 2017 | 9.87 s | 17.43 s | 78.8 mph | 94 bhp |
| De Lorean DMC-12 USA spec | 1978 | 9.84 s | 17.75 s | 82.3 mph | 129 bhp |
| Lada Vesta Sport | 2019 | 9.25 s | 17.26 s | 86.2 mph | 145 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-09-01. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.