← My Auto Racer All cars Jaguar 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Jaguar X-Type 3.0

The Jaguar X-Type 3.0 reaches 60 mph in 7.98 s (100 km/h in 8.41 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.06 s, tripping the lights at 89.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.67 s and the eighth mile in 10.46 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Jaguar X-Type 3.0 Chrysler 300C 3.5 V6 Mk I

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Jaguar X-Type 3.0
0–60 mph7.98 s
0–100 km/h8.41 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.67 s
1/8 mile10.46 s
1/4 mile16.06 s
Trap speed89.0 mph

About the X-Type 3.0

The 2002 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is an all-wheel-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,555 kg with 228 bhp, which works out at 147 bhp per tonne. All-wheel drive is worth most in the first car length: it covers 60 ft in 2.67 s, which is where a four-wheel-drive car takes its margin out of a rear-drive one with the same power. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 6,465th quickest to 60 mph, and the 169th quickest of the 187 Jaguars here. It traps higher than its 0-60 suggests — 89.0 mph, the 5,514th highest here — so it is a car that keeps going rather than one that simply leaves well. The simulation is trimmed to 9 of 9 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Jaguar X-Type 3.0
Year2002
Power228 hp (170 kW)
Kerb mass1,555 kg
Power to weight147 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive
Gears6
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed155 mph (250 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Chrysler 300C 3.5 V6 Mk I20048.10 s16.27 s89.1 mph249 bhp
Honda Prelude 2.0 e:HEV 203 PS20257.81 s16.01 s87.1 mph200 bhp
Ford Fiesta 5dr 1.6 13120087.91 s16.07 s87.8 mph129 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Ford Mondeo 2.3 vs Jaguar X-Type 3.0Full comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Jaguar 0-60 timesevery modelFastest 4x4s and all-wheel-drive cars2,981 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Jaguar X-Type 3.0 0-60 time?
The Jaguar X-Type 3.0 reaches 60 mph in 7.98 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 6,465th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Jaguar X-Type 3.0 quarter mile time?
16.06 s at 89.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.46 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.67 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Jaguar X-Type 3.0 have?
228 bhp and 1,555 kg, which is 147 bhp per tonne. It is all-wheel-drive, naturally aspirated, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 250 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Jaguar X-Type 3.0?
Closest here on pace: Chrysler 300C 3.5 V6 Mk I (8.10 s), Honda Prelude 2.0 e:HEV 203 PS (7.81 s), Ford Fiesta 5dr 1.6 131 (7.91 s). Each one can be raced against the Jaguar X-Type 3.0 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 9 of its 9 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.