← My Auto Racer All cars Lotus 0-60 Comparisons Answers
The Lotus Excel SE reaches 60 mph in 7.05 s (100 km/h in 7.91 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 15.67 s, tripping the lights at 90.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.65 s and the eighth mile in 10.21 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.
| Standing start | Lotus Excel SE |
|---|---|
| 0–60 mph | 7.05 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.91 s |
| 0–100 mph | — |
| 60 ft | 2.65 s |
| 1/8 mile | 10.21 s |
| 1/4 mile | 15.67 s |
| Trap speed | 90.0 mph |
The 1986 Lotus Excel SE is a rear-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,168 kg with 180 bhp, which works out at 154 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 154 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 2.65 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 4,754th quickest to 60 mph, and the 63rd quickest of the 66 Lotuss here. Its 90.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 8 of 9 published acceleration figures for this car.
| Specification | Lotus Excel SE |
|---|---|
| Year | 1986 |
| Power | 180 hp (134 kW) |
| Kerb mass | 1,168 kg |
| Power to weight | 154 bhp/t |
| Drivetrain | Rear drive |
| Gears | 5 |
| Engine | Naturally aspirated |
| Top speed | 134 mph (216 km/h), quoted |
| Car | Year | 0–60 | 1/4 mile | Trap | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiat 595 Abarth 1.4 145 | 2016 | 7.02 s | 15.56 s | 89.8 mph | 143 bhp |
| MG ZS 4dr 2.5 V6 177 | 2001 | 7.00 s | 15.52 s | 92.6 mph | 174 bhp |
| MG ZS 5dr 180 | 2002 | 7.00 s | 15.52 s | 92.6 mph | 174 bhp |
Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.