← My Auto Racer All cars Mazda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mazda CX-5 2.0 160

The Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 reaches 60 mph in 8.64 s (100 km/h in 9.21 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.63 s, tripping the lights at 82.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.59 s and the eighth mile in 10.66 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2 CRDI 200 (2016)

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mazda CX-5 2.0 160
0–60 mph8.64 s
0–100 km/h9.21 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.59 s
1/8 mile10.66 s
1/4 mile16.63 s
Trap speed82.3 mph

About the CX-5 2.0 160

The 2012 Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 is an all-wheel-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 1,530 kg with 158 bhp, which works out at 103 bhp per tonne. All-wheel drive is worth most in the first car length: it covers 60 ft in 2.59 s, which is where a four-wheel-drive car takes its margin out of a rear-drive one with the same power. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 7,770th quickest to 60 mph, and the 76th quickest of the 201 Mazdas here. It leaves better than it pulls: 82.3 mph at the lights is only the 8,751st highest here, so its 0-60 flatters what it does further out. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mazda CX-5 2.0 160
Year2012
Power158 hp (118 kW)
Kerb mass1,530 kg
Power to weight103 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive
Gears6
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed116 mph (187 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2 CRDI 200 (2016)20168.66 s16.65 s81.5 mph197 bhp
Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 dCi CVT 17720178.62 s16.66 s82.2 mph174 bhp
Peugeot 5008 2.0 BlueHDi 15020168.65 s16.68 s83.5 mph148 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Mazda 2 1.6 95 vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 160Full comparison

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 0-60 time?
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 reaches 60 mph in 8.64 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 7,770th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 quarter mile time?
16.63 s at 82.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.66 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.59 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 have?
158 bhp and 1,530 kg, which is 103 bhp per tonne. It is all-wheel-drive, naturally aspirated, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 187 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 160?
Closest here on pace: Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2 CRDI 200 (2016) (8.66 s), Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 dCi CVT 177 (8.62 s), Peugeot 5008 2.0 BlueHDi 150 (8.65 s). Each one can be raced against the Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 160 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.