← My Auto Racer All cars Mazda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155

The Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s (100 km/h in 10.58 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.47 s, tripping the lights at 79.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.82 s and the eighth mile in 11.27 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 Jeep Renegade 1.4 MultiAir 140

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155
0–60 mph9.92 s
0–100 km/h10.58 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.82 s
1/8 mile11.27 s
1/4 mile17.47 s
Trap speed79.3 mph

About the CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155

The 2016 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 is an all-wheel-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 1,510 kg with 153 bhp, which works out at 101 bhp per tonne. All-wheel drive is worth most in the first car length: it covers 60 ft in 2.82 s, which is where a four-wheel-drive car takes its margin out of a rear-drive one with the same power. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,989th quickest to 60 mph, and the 124th quickest of the 201 Mazdas here. Its 79.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155
Year2016
Power153 hp (114 kW)
Kerb mass1,510 kg
Power to weight101 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive
Gears6
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed118 mph (190 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Jeep Renegade 1.4 MultiAir 14020149.92 s17.44 s78.3 mph138 bhp
Kia Sportage 2.0 GDI 16620139.92 s17.47 s78.6 mph164 bhp
Nissan Prairie 2.4 13319899.93 s17.55 s80.3 mph131 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 0-60 time?
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,989th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 quarter mile time?
17.47 s at 79.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.27 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.82 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 have?
153 bhp and 1,510 kg, which is 101 bhp per tonne. It is all-wheel-drive, naturally aspirated, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 190 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155?
Closest here on pace: Jeep Renegade 1.4 MultiAir 140 (9.92 s), Kia Sportage 2.0 GDI 166 (9.92 s), Nissan Prairie 2.4 133 (9.93 s). Each one can be raced against the Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 Skyactiv-G 155 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.