← My Auto Racer All cars Mazda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB)

The Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) reaches 60 mph in 7.73 s (100 km/h in 8.14 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 15.94 s, tripping the lights at 88.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.62 s and the eighth mile in 10.33 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) Peugeot 407 Coupe 2.7 V6 HDi 204

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB)
0–60 mph7.73 s
0–100 km/h8.14 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.62 s
1/8 mile10.33 s
1/4 mile15.94 s
Trap speed88.2 mph

About the RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB)

The 1978 Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) is a rear-drive naturally aspirated coupe of 995 kg with 114 bhp, which works out at 115 bhp per tonne. Rear drive and 115 bhp per tonne make the launch the hard part of the run: 60 ft takes 2.62 s. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 5,998th quickest to 60 mph, and the 50th quickest of the 201 Mazdas here. Its 88.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB)
Year1978
Power114 hp (85 kW)
Kerb mass995 kg
Power to weight115 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed120 mph (193 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Peugeot 407 Coupe 2.7 V6 HDi 20420057.71 s15.92 s89.0 mph201 bhp
Renault Laguna GT 2.0 Dci20087.80 s16.08 s87.9 mph177 bhp
Fiat Coupe 2.0 14719947.62 s16.13 s88.2 mph145 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mazda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest coupes911 carsFastest cars of the 1970s372 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) 0-60 time?
The Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) reaches 60 mph in 7.73 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 5,998th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) quarter mile time?
15.94 s at 88.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.33 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.62 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) have?
114 bhp and 995 kg, which is 115 bhp per tonne. It is rear-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 193 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB)?
Closest here on pace: Peugeot 407 Coupe 2.7 V6 HDi 204 (7.71 s), Renault Laguna GT 2.0 Dci (7.80 s), Fiat Coupe 2.0 147 (7.62 s). Each one can be raced against the Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Mazda RX-7 (SA/FB) 2.3 Rotary (FB) is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.