← My Auto Racer All cars Renault 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163

The Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 reaches 60 mph in 9.23 s (100 km/h in 9.79 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.01 s, tripping the lights at 81.8 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s and the eighth mile in 11.00 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 Toyota Highlander 2.7 185

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163
0–60 mph9.23 s
0–100 km/h9.79 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.81 s
1/8 mile11.00 s
1/4 mile17.01 s
Trap speed81.8 mph

About the Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163

The 2001 Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 is a front-drive turbocharged SUV of 1,625 kg with 161 bhp, which works out at 99 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.81 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 8,834th quickest to 60 mph, and the 145th quickest of the 499 Renaults here. Its 81.8 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163
Year2001
Power161 hp (120 kW)
Kerb mass1,625 kg
Power to weight99 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed127 mph (204 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Toyota Highlander 2.7 18520169.29 s17.07 s80.5 mph185 bhp
Honda HR-V 1.5 i-VTEC 13020189.29 s16.94 s82.3 mph129 bhp
Citroen C5 Aircross 1.2 PureTech 13120189.23 s17.07 s80.4 mph129 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Renault 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 0-60 time?
The Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 reaches 60 mph in 9.23 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 8,834th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 quarter mile time?
17.01 s at 81.8 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.00 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.81 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 have?
161 bhp and 1,625 kg, which is 99 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 204 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163?
Closest here on pace: Toyota Highlander 2.7 185 (9.29 s), Honda HR-V 1.5 i-VTEC 130 (9.29 s), Citroen C5 Aircross 1.2 PureTech 131 (9.23 s). Each one can be raced against the Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Renault Avantime 2.0 Turbo 163 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.