← My Auto Racer All cars Skoda 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150

The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 reaches 60 mph in 8.27 s (100 km/h in 9.02 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 16.46 s, tripping the lights at 83.8 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.56 s and the eighth mile in 10.59 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 Volvo XC90 2.0 D4 190

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150
0–60 mph8.27 s
0–100 km/h9.02 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.56 s
1/8 mile10.59 s
1/4 mile16.46 s
Trap speed83.8 mph

About the Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150

The 2016 Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 is a front-drive turbocharged SUV of 1,551 kg with 148 bhp, which works out at 95 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.56 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 7,063rd quickest to 60 mph, and the 35th quickest of the 178 Skodas here. Its 83.8 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150
Year2016
Power148 hp (110 kW)
Kerb mass1,551 kg
Power to weight95 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed123 mph (198 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Volvo XC90 2.0 D4 19020148.29 s16.45 s84.1 mph188 bhp
Maxus Mifa 9 90kWh 180kW (Elite/Luxury/Premium)20238.24 s16.45 s81.9 mph241 bhp
MINI Countryman Cooper D 2.0 150 (2021)20218.24 s16.40 s86.1 mph148 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Skoda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 0-60 time?
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 reaches 60 mph in 8.27 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 7,063rd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 quarter mile time?
16.46 s at 83.8 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.59 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.56 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 have?
148 bhp and 1,551 kg, which is 95 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 198 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150?
Closest here on pace: Volvo XC90 2.0 D4 190 (8.29 s), Maxus Mifa 9 90kWh 180kW (Elite/Luxury/Premium) (8.24 s), MINI Countryman Cooper D 2.0 150 (2021) (8.24 s). Each one can be raced against the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI ACT 150 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.