← My Auto Racer All cars Vauxhall 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175

The Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 reaches 60 mph in 7.61 s (100 km/h in 8.04 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 15.90 s, tripping the lights at 89.0 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.47 s and the eighth mile in 10.30 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi ECOnetic 180

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175
0–60 mph7.61 s
0–100 km/h8.04 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.47 s
1/8 mile10.30 s
1/4 mile15.90 s
Trap speed89.0 mph

About the Signum 2.0 Turbo 175

The 2005 Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 is a front-drive turbocharged saloon of 1,518 kg with 173 bhp, which works out at 114 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.47 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 5,760th quickest to 60 mph, and the 21st quickest of the 164 Vauxhalls here. Its 89.0 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175
Year2005
Power173 hp (129 kW)
Kerb mass1,518 kg
Power to weight114 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineTurbocharged
Top speed137 mph (220 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi ECOnetic 18020157.62 s15.87 s89.3 mph177 bhp
SEAT Exeo 2.0 TDI 17020087.62 s15.86 s89.5 mph168 bhp
Jaguar XF (X250) 2.2D 20020127.65 s15.89 s87.2 mph197 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Vauxhall 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,808 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 0-60 time?
The Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 reaches 60 mph in 7.61 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 5,760th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 quarter mile time?
15.90 s at 89.0 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.30 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.47 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 have?
173 bhp and 1,518 kg, which is 114 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, turbocharged, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 220 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175?
Closest here on pace: Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi ECOnetic 180 (7.62 s), SEAT Exeo 2.0 TDI 170 (7.62 s), Jaguar XF (X250) 2.2D 200 (7.65 s). Each one can be raced against the Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Vauxhall Signum 2.0 Turbo 175 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.