← My Auto Racer All cars Volvo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Volvo C30 1.6 100

The Volvo C30 1.6 100 reaches 60 mph in 10.76 s (100 km/h in 11.39 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 18.08 s, tripping the lights at 78.4 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.10 s and the eighth mile in 11.80 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo C30 1.6 100 Vauxhall Corsa 3dr 1.2i 80

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Volvo C30 1.6 100
0–60 mph10.76 s
0–100 km/h11.39 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.10 s
1/8 mile11.80 s
1/4 mile18.08 s
Trap speed78.4 mph

About the C30 1.6 100

The 2009 Volvo C30 1.6 100 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,279 kg with 99 bhp, which works out at 78 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.10 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 11,318th quickest to 60 mph, and the 325th quickest of the 386 Volvos here. Its 78.4 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Volvo C30 1.6 100
Year2009
Power99 hp (74 kW)
Kerb mass1,279 kg
Power to weight78 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed115 mph (185 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Vauxhall Corsa 3dr 1.2i 80200110.74 s18.11 s77.5 mph79 bhp
Holden Barina 5dr 1.2 75200110.73 s18.13 s77.1 mph74 bhp
Nissan Note 1.5 dCI 90 (2013)201310.77 s17.97 s76.4 mph89 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Volvo V40 1.6 109 (2000) vs Volvo C30 1.6 100Full comparisonFord Focus RS (2009) vs Volvo C30 1.6 100Full comparisonMazda 2 1.3 75 vs Volvo C30 1.6 100Full comparisonFord Focus Coupe 2.0 140 vs Volvo C30 1.6 100Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,513 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Volvo C30 1.6 100 0-60 time?
The Volvo C30 1.6 100 reaches 60 mph in 10.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 11,318th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Volvo C30 1.6 100 quarter mile time?
18.08 s at 78.4 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.80 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.10 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Volvo C30 1.6 100 have?
99 bhp and 1,279 kg, which is 78 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 185 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Volvo C30 1.6 100?
Closest here on pace: Vauxhall Corsa 3dr 1.2i 80 (10.74 s), Holden Barina 5dr 1.2 75 (10.73 s), Nissan Note 1.5 dCI 90 (2013) (10.77 s). Each one can be raced against the Volvo C30 1.6 100 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Volvo C30 1.6 100 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.