← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R vs Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R is the quicker car, covering it in 15.08 s at 93.3 mph against the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144’s 17.51 s — a margin of 2.43 s. To 60 mph the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R takes 6.58 s and the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 10.10 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startAudi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8RNissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144
0–60 mph6.58 s10.10 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.45 s2.72 s
1/8 mile9.75 s11.30 s
1/4 mile15.08 s17.51 s
Trap speed93.3 mph79.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/9 for the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R, 2/2 for the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationAudi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8RNissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144
Year20092017
Power267 bhp142 bhp
Kerb mass1,805 kg1,425 kg
Power to weight148 bhp/t100 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 7 seconds4,657 cars0-100 km/h under 7 seconds4,035 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Audi 0-60 timesevery modelNissan 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R or the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 faster?
The Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.08 s to the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144's 17.51 s, a margin of 2.43 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.58 s against 10.10 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R 0-60 time?
The Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R reaches 60 mph in 6.58 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.08 s at 93.3 mph.
What is the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 0-60 time?
The Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 reaches 60 mph in 10.10 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.51 s at 79.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R trips the lights at 93.3 mph and the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 at 79.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 9 for the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R and 2 of 2 for the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.