← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) vs Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 is the quicker car, covering it in 17.51 s at 79.2 mph against the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)’s 18.58 s — a margin of 1.07 s. To 60 mph the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 takes 10.10 s and the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) 11.76 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startDacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144
0–60 mph11.76 s10.10 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.79 s2.72 s
1/8 mile11.86 s11.30 s
1/4 mile18.58 s17.51 s
Trap speed73.4 mph79.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013), 2/2 for the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationDacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144
Year20132017
Power103 bhp142 bhp
Kerb mass1,250 kg1,425 kg
Power to weight83 bhp/t100 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Dacia 0-60 timesevery modelNissan 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) or the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 faster?
The Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.51 s to the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)'s 18.58 s, a margin of 1.07 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 10.10 s against 11.76 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) 0-60 time?
The Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) reaches 60 mph in 11.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.58 s at 73.4 mph.
What is the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 0-60 time?
The Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 reaches 60 mph in 10.10 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.51 s at 79.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) trips the lights at 73.4 mph and the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144 at 79.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) and 2 of 2 for the Nissan X-Trail (T32) 2.0 144. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.