← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 vs Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.72 s at 81.1 mph against the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)’s 18.58 s — a margin of 1.86 s. To 60 mph the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 takes 8.76 s and the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) 11.76 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)
0–60 mph8.76 s11.76 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.49 s2.79 s
1/8 mile10.66 s11.86 s
1/4 mile16.72 s18.58 s
Trap speed81.1 mph73.4 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180, 2/2 for the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)
Year20202013
Power177 bhp103 bhp
Kerb mass1,716 kg1,250 kg
Power to weight103 bhp/t83 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelDacia 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 or the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) faster?
The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.72 s to the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013)'s 18.58 s, a margin of 1.86 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s against 11.76 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 0-60 time?
The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 reaches 60 mph in 8.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.72 s at 81.1 mph.
What is the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) 0-60 time?
The Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) reaches 60 mph in 11.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.58 s at 73.4 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 trips the lights at 81.1 mph and the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013) at 73.4 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 and 2 of 2 for the Dacia Duster 1.6 105 (2013). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.