Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 vs Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 is the quicker car,
covering it in 17.45 s at
78.8 mph against the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69’s
19.18 s — a margin of
1.74 s. To 60 mph the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 takes
9.92 s and the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69
12.48 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95
0–60 mph
12.48 s
9.92 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.17 s
2.77 s
1/8 mile
12.38 s
11.21 s
1/4 mile
19.18 s
17.45 s
Trap speed
72.6 mph
78.8 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69,
2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 or the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 faster?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 17.45 s to the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69's 19.18 s, a margin of 1.74 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s against 12.48 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 0-60 time?
The Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 reaches 60 mph in 12.48 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.18 s at 72.6 mph.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 trips the lights at 72.6 mph and the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 at 78.8 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Fiat Punto 3dr 1.2 69 and 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.