← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 vs Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph against the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130’s 17.98 s — a margin of 0.99 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 takes 9.37 s and the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 10.91 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130
0–60 mph9.37 s10.91 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.52 s2.81 s
1/8 mile10.90 s11.59 s
1/4 mile16.99 s17.98 s
Trap speed80.9 mph76.9 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120, 2/2 for the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationFord Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130
Year20192017
Power118 bhp130 bhp
Kerb mass1,348 kg1,183 kg
Power to weight88 bhp/t110 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbodieselNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Ford 0-60 timesevery modelHonda 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 or the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.99 s to the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130's 17.98 s, a margin of 0.99 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s against 10.91 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph.
What is the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 0-60 time?
The Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 reaches 60 mph in 10.91 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.98 s at 76.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 trips the lights at 80.9 mph and the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130 at 76.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 and 2 of 2 for the Honda Jazz/Fit 1.5 130. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.