Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R is the quicker car,
covering it in 15.08 s at
93.3 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.4 166’s
17.67 s — a margin of
2.59 s. To 60 mph the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R takes
6.58 s and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166
9.99 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Honda CR-V 2.4 166Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Honda CR-V 2.4 166
Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R
0–60 mph
9.99 s
6.58 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.08 s
2.45 s
1/8 mile
11.56 s
9.75 s
1/4 mile
17.67 s
15.08 s
Trap speed
80.7 mph
93.3 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166,
9/9 for the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 or the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R faster?
The Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.08 s to the Honda CR-V 2.4 166's 17.67 s, a margin of 2.59 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 6.58 s against 9.99 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What is the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R 0-60 time?
The Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R reaches 60 mph in 6.58 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.08 s at 93.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 trips the lights at 80.7 mph and the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R at 93.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 and 9 of 9 for the Audi Q5 3.2 FSI quattro 8R. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.