← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 vs Volvo XC90 3.2 238

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.69 s at 84.3 mph against the Honda CR-V 2.4 166’s 17.67 s — a margin of 0.97 s. To 60 mph the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 takes 8.58 s and the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 9.99 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Honda CR-V 2.4 166 Volvo XC90 3.2 238

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHonda CR-V 2.4 166Volvo XC90 3.2 238
0–60 mph9.99 s8.58 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.08 s2.73 s
1/8 mile11.56 s10.80 s
1/4 mile17.67 s16.69 s
Trap speed80.7 mph84.3 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166, 2/2 for the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHonda CR-V 2.4 166Volvo XC90 3.2 238
Year20072007
Power166 bhp240 bhp
Kerb mass1,537 kg2,212 kg
Power to weight108 bhp/t109 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Honda 0-60 timesevery modelVolvo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 or the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 faster?
The Volvo XC90 3.2 238. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.69 s to the Honda CR-V 2.4 166's 17.67 s, a margin of 0.97 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.58 s against 9.99 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 0-60 time?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 reaches 60 mph in 9.99 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.67 s at 80.7 mph.
What is the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC90 3.2 238 reaches 60 mph in 8.58 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.69 s at 84.3 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Honda CR-V 2.4 166 trips the lights at 80.7 mph and the Volvo XC90 3.2 238 at 84.3 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Honda CR-V 2.4 166 and 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC90 3.2 238. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.