← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 vs Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.47 s at 86.1 mph against the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)’s 17.36 s — a margin of 1.90 s. To 60 mph the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 takes 7.01 s and the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) 9.66 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startHyundai Kona 1.6 177Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)
0–60 mph7.01 s9.66 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.15 s2.92 s
1/8 mile9.77 s11.28 s
1/4 mile15.47 s17.36 s
Trap speed86.1 mph81.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177, 2/2 for the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationHyundai Kona 1.6 177Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)
Year20172011
Power174 bhp154 bhp
Kerb mass1,401 kg1,424 kg
Power to weight124 bhp/t108 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 8 seconds5,609 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Hyundai 0-60 timesevery modelJeep 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 or the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) faster?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.47 s to the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011)'s 17.36 s, a margin of 1.90 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.01 s against 9.66 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 0-60 time?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 reaches 60 mph in 7.01 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.47 s at 86.1 mph.
What is the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) 0-60 time?
The Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) reaches 60 mph in 9.66 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.36 s at 81.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 trips the lights at 86.1 mph and the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011) at 81.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Hyundai Kona 1.6 177 and 2 of 2 for the Jeep Compass 2.0 156 (2011). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.