← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Jaguar XE 2.0 163 vs BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Jaguar XE 2.0 163 is the quicker car, covering it in 15.93 s at 86.7 mph against the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143’s 16.38 s — a margin of 0.45 s. To 60 mph the Jaguar XE 2.0 163 takes 7.60 s and the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 8.28 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Jaguar XE 2.0 163 BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startJaguar XE 2.0 163BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143
0–60 mph7.60 s8.28 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.43 s2.39 s
1/8 mile10.29 s10.46 s
1/4 mile15.93 s16.38 s
Trap speed86.7 mph84.1 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Jaguar XE 2.0 163, 2/2 for the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationJaguar XE 2.0 163BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143
Year20152012
Power161 bhp141 bhp
Kerb mass1,475 kg1,490 kg
Power to weight109 bhp/t95 bhp/t
DrivetrainRear driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,521 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Jaguar 0-60 timesevery modelBMW 0-60 timesevery modelFastest saloon cars3,824 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Jaguar XE 2.0 163 or the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 faster?
The Jaguar XE 2.0 163. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 15.93 s to the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143's 16.38 s, a margin of 0.45 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 7.60 s against 8.28 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Jaguar XE 2.0 163 0-60 time?
The Jaguar XE 2.0 163 reaches 60 mph in 7.60 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.93 s at 86.7 mph.
What is the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 0-60 time?
The BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 reaches 60 mph in 8.28 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.38 s at 84.1 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Jaguar XE 2.0 163 trips the lights at 86.7 mph and the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143 at 84.1 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Jaguar XE 2.0 163 and 2 of 2 for the BMW 3 Series (F30) 318 xDrive 143. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.