← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX vs Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX is the quicker car, covering it in 13.77 s at 102.0 mph against the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140’s 16.92 s — a margin of 3.15 s. To 60 mph the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX takes 5.28 s and the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 9.12 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startMitsubishi Lancer EVO IXProton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140
0–60 mph5.28 s9.12 s
0–100 mph12.94 s—
60 ft2.23 s2.90 s
1/8 mile8.95 s11.06 s
1/4 mile13.77 s16.92 s
Trap speed102.0 mph84.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 9/10 for the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX, 2/2 for the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer EVO IXProton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140
Year20052010
Power286 bhp138 bhp
Kerb mass1,482 kg1,300 kg
Power to weight193 bhp/t106 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

0-60 under 6 seconds3,252 cars0-100 km/h under 6 seconds2,897 carsQuarter mile under 14 seconds2,646 cars0-100 under 16 seconds2,743 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Mitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelProton 0-60 timesevery model

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX or the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 faster?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 13.77 s to the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140's 16.92 s, a margin of 3.15 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 5.28 s against 9.12 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX reaches 60 mph in 5.28 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 13.77 s at 102.0 mph.
What is the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 0-60 time?
The Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 reaches 60 mph in 9.12 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.92 s at 84.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX trips the lights at 102.0 mph and the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140 at 84.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 9 of 10 for the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX and 2 of 2 for the Proton Inspira 1.8 MIVEC 140. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.