Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 vs Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90
Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 is the quicker car,
covering it in 18.15 s at
74.9 mph against the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75’s
19.57 s — a margin of
1.43 s. To 60 mph the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 takes
11.34 s and the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75
13.21 s.
Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass,
rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures.
Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90
Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather
or the distance and run it again.
Down the strip
Standing start
Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75
Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90
0–60 mph
13.21 s
11.34 s
0–100 mph
—
—
60 ft
3.36 s
2.67 s
1/8 mile
12.76 s
11.61 s
1/4 mile
19.57 s
18.15 s
Trap speed
72.3 mph
74.9 mph
Each car is trimmed to its own published figures —
2/2 for the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75,
2/2 for the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 —
so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.
Is the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 or the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 faster?
The Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 18.15 s to the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75's 19.57 s, a margin of 1.43 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 11.34 s against 13.21 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 0-60 time?
The Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 reaches 60 mph in 13.21 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.57 s at 72.3 mph.
What is the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 0-60 time?
The Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 reaches 60 mph in 11.34 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 18.15 s at 74.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 trips the lights at 72.3 mph and the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90 at 74.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Renault Clio Estate 1.2 75 and 2 of 2 for the Toyota AURIS 1.4 4D 90. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.
Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.