← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 vs Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph against the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112’s 17.77 s — a margin of 0.78 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 takes 9.37 s and the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 10.41 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startSuzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120
0–60 mph10.41 s9.37 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.79 s2.52 s
1/8 mile11.39 s10.90 s
1/4 mile17.77 s16.99 s
Trap speed77.3 mph80.9 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112, 2/2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationSuzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120
Year20182019
Power110 bhp118 bhp
Kerb mass1,199 kg1,348 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t88 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Suzuki 0-60 timesevery modelFord 0-60 timesevery modelFastest cars of the 2010s4,546 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 or the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 faster?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.99 s to the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112's 17.77 s, a margin of 0.78 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s against 10.41 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 0-60 time?
The Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 reaches 60 mph in 10.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.77 s at 77.3 mph.
What is the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.99 s at 80.9 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 trips the lights at 77.3 mph and the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120 at 80.9 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Suzuki Vitara 1.0 Boosterjet 112 and 2 of 2 for the Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBlue 120. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.