← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 is the quicker car, covering it in 19.11 s at 74.0 mph against the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72’s 19.80 s — a margin of 0.69 s. To 60 mph the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 takes 12.40 s and the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 14.14 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startToyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71
0–60 mph14.14 s12.40 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft3.07 s3.28 s
1/8 mile12.72 s12.46 s
1/4 mile19.80 s19.11 s
Trap speed69.5 mph74.0 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72, 2/2 for the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationToyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71
Year20212013
Power71 bhp70 bhp
Kerb mass940 kg845 kg
Power to weight76 bhp/t83 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedNaturally aspirated

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Toyota 0-60 timesevery modelMitsubishi 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,686 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 or the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 faster?
The Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 19.11 s to the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72's 19.80 s, a margin of 0.69 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 12.40 s against 14.14 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 0-60 time?
The Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 reaches 60 mph in 14.14 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.80 s at 69.5 mph.
What is the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 0-60 time?
The Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 reaches 60 mph in 12.40 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 19.11 s at 74.0 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 trips the lights at 69.5 mph and the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71 at 74.0 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 and 2 of 2 for the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 MIVEC 71. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.