← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 vs Ford Puma ST Mk II

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Ford Puma ST Mk II is the quicker car, covering it in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph against the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95’s 17.45 s — a margin of 2.85 s. To 60 mph the Ford Puma ST Mk II takes 5.94 s and the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 9.92 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 Ford Puma ST Mk II

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95Ford Puma ST Mk II
0–60 mph9.92 s5.94 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.77 s2.25 s
1/8 mile11.21 s9.38 s
1/4 mile17.45 s14.60 s
Trap speed78.8 mph94.2 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95, 9/10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95Ford Puma ST Mk II
Year20222020
Power94 bhp197 bhp
Kerb mass1,165 kg1,358 kg
Power to weight81 bhp/t145 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront driveFront drive
EngineTurbochargedTurbocharged

Where these times sit

0-60 under 6 seconds3,252 cars0-100 km/h under 7 seconds4,035 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volkswagen 0-60 timesevery modelFord 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,527 carsFastest cars of the 2020s868 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 or the Ford Puma ST Mk II faster?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 14.60 s to the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95's 17.45 s, a margin of 2.85 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s against 9.92 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 0-60 time?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 reaches 60 mph in 9.92 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.45 s at 78.8 mph.
What is the Ford Puma ST Mk II 0-60 time?
The Ford Puma ST Mk II reaches 60 mph in 5.94 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 14.60 s at 94.2 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 trips the lights at 78.8 mph and the Ford Puma ST Mk II at 94.2 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 and 9 of 10 for the Ford Puma ST Mk II. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.