← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo XC60 3.2 243 vs Nissan Murano 2.5 190

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 is the quicker car, covering it in 16.95 s at 83.3 mph against the Nissan Murano 2.5 190’s 17.02 s — a margin of 0.07 s. To 60 mph the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 takes 8.95 s and the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 9.46 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo XC60 3.2 243 Nissan Murano 2.5 190

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo XC60 3.2 243Nissan Murano 2.5 190
0–60 mph8.95 s9.46 s
0–100 mph——
60 ft2.80 s2.54 s
1/8 mile10.98 s10.85 s
1/4 mile16.95 s17.02 s
Trap speed83.3 mph79.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo XC60 3.2 243, 2/2 for the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo XC60 3.2 243Nissan Murano 2.5 190
Year20082008
Power240 bhp188 bhp
Kerb mass1,942 kg1,950 kg
Power to weight124 bhp/t96 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineNaturally aspiratedTurbodiesel

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,147 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,071 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelNissan 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,151 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 or the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 faster?
The Volvo XC60 3.2 243. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 16.95 s to the Nissan Murano 2.5 190's 17.02 s, a margin of 0.07 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 8.95 s against 9.46 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 3.2 243 reaches 60 mph in 8.95 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 16.95 s at 83.3 mph.
What is the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 0-60 time?
The Nissan Murano 2.5 190 reaches 60 mph in 9.46 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 17.02 s at 79.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo XC60 3.2 243 trips the lights at 83.3 mph and the Nissan Murano 2.5 190 at 79.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 3.2 243 and 2 of 2 for the Nissan Murano 2.5 190. Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.