← My Auto Racer All cars Daewoo 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122

The Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s (100 km/h in 9.92 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.20 s, tripping the lights at 81.3 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.84 s and the eighth mile in 11.13 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 Maruti Suzuki Baleno 1.6 90

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122
0–60 mph9.37 s
0–100 km/h9.92 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.84 s
1/8 mile11.13 s
1/4 mile17.20 s
Trap speed81.3 mph

About the Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122

The 2004 Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 1,306 kg with 121 bhp, which works out at 92 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.84 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,056th quickest to 60 mph, and the 9th quickest of the 45 Daewoos here. Its 81.3 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122
Year2004
Power121 hp (90 kW)
Kerb mass1,306 kg
Power to weight92 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed112 mph (180 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Maruti Suzuki Baleno 1.6 9020009.36 s17.23 s80.8 mph90 bhp
Alfa Romeo 33 1.3 8819909.37 s17.22 s80.9 mph87 bhp
Lancia Dedra 1.8 11319959.39 s17.15 s82.2 mph111 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 cars0-100 km/h under 10 seconds9,062 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Daewoo 0-60 timesevery modelFastest hatchbacks4,513 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 0-60 time?
The Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 reaches 60 mph in 9.37 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,056th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 quarter mile time?
17.20 s at 81.3 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.13 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.84 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 have?
121 bhp and 1,306 kg, which is 92 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 180 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122?
Closest here on pace: Maruti Suzuki Baleno 1.6 90 (9.36 s), Alfa Romeo 33 1.3 88 (9.37 s), Lancia Dedra 1.8 113 (9.39 s). Each one can be raced against the Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Daewoo Tacuma/Rezzo 2.0 122 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.