← My Auto Racer All cars Toyota 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68

The Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 reaches 60 mph in 13.31 s (100 km/h in 14.24 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 19.29 s, tripping the lights at 71.7 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 3.14 s and the eighth mile in 12.39 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 Tata Motors Indigo Manza 1.3 QuadraJet 90

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68
0–60 mph13.31 s
0–100 km/h14.24 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft3.14 s
1/8 mile12.39 s
1/4 mile19.29 s
Trap speed71.7 mph

About the iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68

The 2009 Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 is a front-drive naturally aspirated car of 845 kg with 67 bhp, which works out at 79 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 3.14 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 13,777th quickest to 60 mph, and the 287th quickest of the 311 Toyotas here. Its 71.7 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68
Year2009
Power67 hp (50 kW)
Kerb mass845 kg
Power to weight79 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears5
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed93 mph (150 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Tata Motors Indigo Manza 1.3 QuadraJet 90200913.11 s19.29 s71.5 mph90 bhp
Dacia Nova 1.6 72199513.34 s19.65 s71.4 mph71 bhp
Dacia Nova 1.4 SuperNova 75199513.34 s19.65 s71.4 mph74 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Head to head

Toyota Aygo X 1.0 VVT-i 72 vs Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68Full comparisonVolkswagen up! 1.0 vs Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68Full comparisonFiat 500 1.2 69 vs Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68Full comparison

Where these times sit

Slower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Toyota 0-60 timesevery modelFastest small cars1,681 carsFastest cars of the 2000s5,138 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 0-60 time?
The Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 reaches 60 mph in 13.31 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 13,777th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 quarter mile time?
19.29 s at 71.7 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 12.39 s and clears the first 60 ft in 3.14 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 have?
67 bhp and 845 kg, which is 79 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 5 gears and a quoted top speed of 150 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68?
Closest here on pace: Tata Motors Indigo Manza 1.3 QuadraJet 90 (13.11 s), Dacia Nova 1.6 72 (13.34 s), Dacia Nova 1.4 SuperNova 75 (13.34 s). Each one can be raced against the Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Toyota iQ 1.0 VVT-i 68 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.