← My Auto Racer All cars Vauxhall 0-60 Comparisons Answers

Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167

The Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 reaches 60 mph in 9.56 s (100 km/h in 10.11 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 17.13 s, tripping the lights at 81.2 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.68 s and the eighth mile in 11.08 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 Chevrolet Trax 1.4 Ecotec Turbo MFI 138

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167
0–60 mph9.56 s
0–100 km/h10.11 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.68 s
1/8 mile11.08 s
1/4 mile17.13 s
Trap speed81.2 mph

About the Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167

The 2010 Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 is a front-drive naturally aspirated SUV of 1,750 kg with 165 bhp, which works out at 94 bhp per tonne. Front drive caps what it can put down off the line — 60 ft takes 2.68 s — so most of what it has to give arrives once it is already moving. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 9,367th quickest to 60 mph, and the 73rd quickest of the 164 Vauxhalls here. Its 81.2 mph trap speed sits about where its 0-60 puts it, so it launches and pulls in roughly equal measure. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167
Year2010
Power165 hp (123 kW)
Kerb mass1,750 kg
Power to weight94 bhp/t
DrivetrainFront drive
Gears6
EngineNaturally aspirated
Top speed118 mph (190 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Chevrolet Trax 1.4 Ecotec Turbo MFI 13820179.53 s17.10 s78.9 mph137 bhp
Suzuki SX4 1.9 DDiS 12020069.56 s17.08 s80.7 mph118 bhp
Holden Captiva 2.4 DOHC 16720119.53 s17.08 s80.7 mph165 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 10 seconds10,136 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Vauxhall 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,049 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 0-60 time?
The Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 reaches 60 mph in 9.56 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 9,367th quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 quarter mile time?
17.13 s at 81.2 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 11.08 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.68 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 have?
165 bhp and 1,750 kg, which is 94 bhp per tonne. It is front-drive, naturally aspirated, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 190 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167?
Closest here on pace: Chevrolet Trax 1.4 Ecotec Turbo MFI 138 (9.53 s), Suzuki SX4 1.9 DDiS 120 (9.56 s), Holden Captiva 2.4 DOHC 167 (9.53 s). Each one can be raced against the Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The Vauxhall Antara 2.4 ECOTEC 167 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.