← My Auto Racer All cars VW 0-60 Comparisons Answers

VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177

The VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 reaches 60 mph in 7.41 s (100 km/h in 7.92 s) and covers a standing quarter mile in 15.78 s, tripping the lights at 86.7 mph. It clears the first 60 ft in 2.39 s and the eighth mile in 10.08 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from published kerb mass, rated power, gearing and drivetrain, then fitted to this car’s own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 Jaguar XJ 2.7 D V6 204

Pick who it runs against, then watch it happen — and change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing start VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177
0–60 mph7.41 s
0–100 km/h7.92 s
0–100 mph—
60 ft2.39 s
1/8 mile10.08 s
1/4 mile15.78 s
Trap speed86.7 mph

About the CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177

The 2012 VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 is an all-wheel-drive turbodiesel saloon of 1,683 kg with 174 bhp, which works out at 104 bhp per tonne. All-wheel drive is worth most in the first car length: it covers 60 ft in 2.39 s, which is where a four-wheel-drive car takes its margin out of a rear-drive one with the same power. Against the 14,946 cars in the set it is the 5,383rd quickest to 60 mph, and the 228th quickest of the 1124 VWs here. It leaves better than it pulls: 86.7 mph at the lights is only the 6,515th highest here, so its 0-60 flatters what it does further out. The simulation is trimmed to 2 of 2 published acceleration figures for this car.

On paper

Specification VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177
Year2012
Power174 hp (130 kW)
Kerb mass1,683 kg
Power to weight104 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive
Gears6
EngineTurbodiesel
Top speed137 mph (220 km/h), quoted

Similar cars

CarYear 0–601/4 mileTrapPower
Jaguar XJ 2.7 D V6 20420037.37 s15.73 s88.2 mph168 bhp
Lexus IS 300h20147.43 s15.83 s85.6 mph178 bhp
Volvo S90 D420167.45 s15.70 s93.7 mph188 bhp

Picked for a fair race, not just a matching 0-60: pace, power-to-weight and body shape all count, and at most one is from the same maker.

Where these times sit

0-60 under 8 seconds6,514 cars0-100 km/h under 8 seconds5,602 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
VW 0-60 timesevery modelFastest 4x4s and all-wheel-drive cars2,981 carsFastest cars of the 2010s4,541 cars
Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Questions

What is the VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 0-60 time?
The VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 reaches 60 mph in 7.41 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. That makes it the 5,383rd quickest of the 14,946 cars in the set.
What is the VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 quarter mile time?
15.78 s at 86.7 mph. It reaches the eighth mile in 10.08 s and clears the first 60 ft in 2.39 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
How much power does the VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 have?
174 bhp and 1,683 kg, which is 104 bhp per tonne. It is all-wheel-drive, turbodiesel, with 6 gears and a quoted top speed of 220 km/h. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What cars are comparable to the VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177?
Closest here on pace: Jaguar XJ 2.7 D V6 204 (7.37 s), Lexus IS 300h (7.43 s), Volvo S90 D4 (7.45 s). Each one can be raced against the VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 in the panel at the top of this page. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every figure on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. The VW CC 2.0 TDI 4Motion 177 is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it reproduces 2 of its 2 published acceleration figures. Conditions are the same for every car in the set: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.