← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

BMW X3 M 3.0 480 vs Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the BMW X3 M 3.0 480 is the quicker car, covering it in 12.07 s at 114.7 mph against the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)’s 12.68 s — a margin of 0.61 s. To 60 mph the BMW X3 M 3.0 480 takes 3.76 s and the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) 3.88 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

BMW X3 M 3.0 480 Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startBMW X3 M 3.0 480Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)
0–60 mph3.76 s3.88 s
0–100 mph8.85 s11.34 s
60 ft1.85 s1.78 s
1/8 mile7.77 s7.99 s
1/4 mile12.07 s12.68 s
Trap speed114.7 mph104.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the BMW X3 M 3.0 480, 2/2 for the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationBMW X3 M 3.0 480Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)
Year20192025
Power473 bhp483 bhp
Kerb mass1,970 kg2,335 kg
Power to weight240 bhp/t207 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbochargedElectric

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 4 seconds881 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 9 seconds871 carsTraps over 100 mph2,740 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
BMW 0-60 timesevery modelGenesis 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the BMW X3 M 3.0 480 or the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) faster?
The BMW X3 M 3.0 480. Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.07 s to the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)'s 12.68 s, a margin of 0.61 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.76 s against 3.88 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the BMW X3 M 3.0 480 0-60 time?
The BMW X3 M 3.0 480 reaches 60 mph in 3.76 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.07 s at 114.7 mph.
What is the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) 0-60 time?
The Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) reaches 60 mph in 3.88 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.68 s at 104.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The BMW X3 M 3.0 480 trips the lights at 114.7 mph and the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) at 104.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the BMW X3 M 3.0 480 and 2 of 2 for the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.