← My Auto Racer All cars Comparisons Answers 0-60 by make Fastest lists

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 vs Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)

Over a standing quarter mile on dry asphalt the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) is the quicker car, covering it in 12.68 s at 104.5 mph against the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190’s 15.80 s — a margin of 3.12 s. To 60 mph the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) takes 3.88 s and the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 7.49 s.

Simulated, not measured — computed from each car’s published kerb mass, rated power and drivetrain, then fitted to its own published acceleration figures. Dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)

Watch the run in full — then change the surface, the weather or the distance and run it again.

Down the strip

Standing startVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)
0–60 mph7.49 s3.88 s
0–100 mph—11.34 s
60 ft2.19 s1.78 s
1/8 mile10.00 s7.99 s
1/4 mile15.80 s12.68 s
Trap speed84.6 mph104.5 mph

Each car is trimmed to its own published figures — 2/2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190, 2/2 for the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) — so a heavier car can still be the quicker one if that is what it tests.

On paper

SpecificationVolvo XC60 2.0 D4 190Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift)
Year20172025
Power188 bhp483 bhp
Kerb mass1,910 kg2,335 kg
Power to weight98 bhp/t207 bhp/t
DrivetrainAll-wheel driveAll-wheel drive
EngineTurbodieselElectric

Where these times sit

0-60 under 4 seconds1,060 cars0-100 km/h under 5 seconds1,846 carsQuarter mile under 13 seconds1,639 cars0-100 under 12 seconds1,964 carsSlower in the wetevery car, re-runThe cost of altitudeevery car, re-runThe cost of a passengerevery car, re-run
Volvo 0-60 timesevery modelGenesis 0-60 timesevery modelFastest SUVs2,062 cars

Try another matchup

Put this race on your own page

Free to use anywhere, no attribution required beyond the credit line included above. How to embed →

Or open the full simulator →

Questions

Is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 or the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) faster?
The Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift). Over a standing quarter mile it runs 12.68 s to the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190's 15.80 s, a margin of 3.12 s, and it reaches 60 mph in 3.88 s against 7.49 s. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
What is the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 0-60 time?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 reaches 60 mph in 7.49 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 15.80 s at 84.6 mph.
What is the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) 0-60 time?
The Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) reaches 60 mph in 3.88 s, simulated on dry asphalt at 20 °C with a 1 ft rollout. It covers the standing quarter mile in 12.68 s at 104.5 mph.
What trap speed does each car run?
The Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 trips the lights at 84.6 mph and the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift) at 104.5 mph at the end of the quarter mile. These are theoretical times from a physics simulation, not measured runs.
Are these real measured times?
No. Every time on this page is produced by a physics simulation, not by a stopwatch at a drag strip. Each car is modelled from its published kerb mass, rated power, drivetrain and gearing, then trimmed until it matches its own published acceleration figures — 2 of 2 for the Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 190 and 2 of 2 for the Genesis Electrified GV70 Electrified GV70 84 kWh (facelift). Conditions are identical for both cars: dry asphalt, 20 °C, sea level, 1 ft rollout.

Figures regenerated 2026-10-12. Every number on this page is computed by the simulator at build time, so the page and the app can never disagree.